Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 F.2d 825 - White Hawk v. Solem

White Hawk v. Solem’s Empirical Analysis

693 F.2d 825 · 1982

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2023

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

12019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4244 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Alford · Edwards v. Arizona · Fay v. Noia · McMann v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As long as there is in fact a strong factual basis supporting a guilty plea, it is valid even if the defendant protests his innocence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... It is, after all, the defendant’s prerogative to plead guilty or not, as he chooses. Our inquiry must focus on whether there has been effective assistance of counsel. ____ [E]ach person is ultimately responsible for choosing his own fate, including his position before the law. A defendant has the moral right to stand alone in this hour of trial and to embrace the consequences of that course of action—”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.