Yeager v. Bowlin’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.3d 1076 · 2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 district · 5 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp. · School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc. · United States v. Hinkson · Olsen v. Idaho State Board of Medicine · Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because it is in tension with the principle that the court is not to make credibility determinations when granting or denying summary judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). To trigger the sham affidavit rule,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] statement on a website is not republished unless the statement itself is substantively altered or added to, or the website is directed to a new audience.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.