Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 F.3d 1122 - Schmidt v. Contra Costa County

Schmidt v. Contra Costa County’s Empirical Analysis

693 F.3d 1122 · 2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Tenney v. Brandhove · Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. · Bogan v. Scott-Harris · Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “parallel to the immunity provided by the Speech or Debate Clause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.