United States v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.3d 261 · 2012
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 2025
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1959 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Dusky v. United States · Drope v. Missouri · McKaskle v. Wiggins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.