Lozano v. Bosdet’s Empirical Analysis
693 F.3d 485 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Marin · Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. · Gonzalez v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. · D.J. Investments, Inc. v. Metzeler Motorcycle Tire Agent Gregg, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This subdivision (m) does not apply to service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f) or 4(j)(Z).”); see also Lozano v. Bosdet, 693 F.3d 485, 488 (5th Cir.2012). 10 . See Lozano, 693 F.3d at 488-89 . 11 . See also Lozano, 693 F.3d at n. 8 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.