Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

693 F. App'x 190

Taylor v. Bettis

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2017

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2017-07-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2018

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2017-07-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶2Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting the Arnold Defendants’ motion to dismiss, granting the E&D Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, granting default judgment against other defendants and awarding damages, and entering final judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no error. As to their argument for sevenfold damages, Appellants merely repeat the argument they raised to the district court, but have failed to identify any error in the district court’s consideration of appropriate damages. As to the remainder of Appellants’ arguments, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Bettis, Nos. 7:09-cv-00183-F; 7:09-cv-00081-F, 2013 WL 5460755, 2014 WL 10677478 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2013; Mar. 27, 2014; Apr. 7, 2016; Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3AFFIRMED

/693/fappx/190 · .json · Public domain