¶1 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion,
¶2 Phillip W. Fields appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying his cross-motion for summary judgment in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000ec to 2000cc-5 (2012). Applying a de novo standard of review, Lawson v. Union Cty. Clerk of Court, 828 F.3d 239, 247 (4th Cir. 2016); Henson v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 61 F.3d 270, 274 (4th Cir. 1995), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s judgment. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fields v. Robinson, No. 3:15-cv-00455-HEH, 2017 WL 253955 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶3 AFFIRMED