Milo & Gabby LLC v. amazon.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 271
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. · Pinter v. Dahl · Carducci v. Regan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Amazon ...did not control what information or pictures were put on the product-detail page, nor did it control the price for which the product was sold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“while Amazon's services made it easier for third parties to consummate a sale, the third parties remained the sellers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“warehouse for storage and Amazon boxed up and shipped the product when a sale was consummated on the website.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.