Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 FSUPP 8 - Soto v. Lord

Soto v. Lord’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2015

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Parratt v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The chain of custody requirement, commonly found in contraband eases and litigation in which scientific analysis is relevant, mandates a continuous, physical nexus between the source of the substance in issue, the testing or analytical process to which the substance is subjected, and the proponent of the substance as real evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he law [is] 'clearly established' that minimum due process require[s] a prison disciplinary body to establish a reasonably reliable chain of custody as a foundation for introducing the results of urinalysis tests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.