Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 P2D 4 - Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Witherspoon v. Illinois · United States v. Cronic · Engle v. Isaac · Eddings v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.