Hayes v. Charney’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. State (1991), Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric Institute (2009)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on RLR v. State · Doe v. State · Johansen v. State · Etheredge v. Bradley · Witt v. Watkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) whether the disputed issues are capable of repetition, 2) whether the mootness doctrine, if applied, may repeatedly circumvent review of the issues and, 3) whether the issues presented are so important to the public interest as to justify overriding the mootness doctrine.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“where the matter is one of public concern and is recurrent but is capable of evading review,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“refrain from deciding questions 'where the facts have rendered the legal issues moot.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.