In Re Dw’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · Quilloin v. Walcott · 156 N.C. App. 533 - In Re Humphrey · Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When ... a parent is absent from a termination proceeding and the trial court preserves the adversarial nature of the proceeding by allowing the parent's counsel to cross examine witnesses ... the parent must demonstrate some actual prejudice in order to prevail upon appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]arental absence, without more, [does not] constitute[ ] extraordinary circumstances necessitating a continuance[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The court may, for good cause, continue the hearing for as long as is reasonably required to receive additional evidence, reports or assessments that the court has requested, or other information needed in the best interests of the juvenile and to allow for a reasonable time for the parties to conduct expeditious discovery. Otherwise, continuances shall be granted only in extraordinary circumstances when necessary for the proper administration of justice or in the best interests of the juvenile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.