Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

693 So. 2d 141

L.E.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-05-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1998

2 state decisions

Relies on Ridley v. State · Almulla v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the adjudications of guilt for the commission of the delinquent acts of burglary of a conveyance in violation of section 810.02(1) and (3), and section 777.011, Florida Statutes (1995), and dealing in stolen property, a second degree felony, in violation of section 812.019(1), Florida Statutes (1995). We vacate the conviction for grand theft, a third degree felony, in violation of sections 812.014(1) and (2)(c). Section 812.025, Florida Statutes (1995) prohibits convictions for both dealing in stolen property and grand theft arising out of a single course of conduct. See Almulla v. State, 677 So.2d 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Ridley v. State, 407 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

¶2AFFIRMED IN PART; ORDER PARTIALLY VACATED.

" PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/693/so2d/141 · .json · Public domain