693 So. 2d 586 - Junior v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Paul v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At best, [Dr. Gervin] established a temporary, partial loss of income that does not invoke the protection of the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gervin v. Andrews“The focus of the inquiry must be on the loss of a protected right, not on the eventual loss of income as a consequence of the defamation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gervin v. Andrews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.