Sweet v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McKay v. Jobin · Larzelere v. State · 550 So. 2d 102 - Eberhardt v. State · 583 So. 2d 642 - Christopher v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because portions of the defendant's conversation with the officer were admitted on direct examination, the rule of completeness generally allows admission of the balance of the conversation as well as other related conversations that in fairness are necessary for the jury to accurately perceive the whole context of what has transpired between the two. (citation omitted). Once the officer testified in the state's case-in-chief about one portion of Eberhardt's statements to him, the court erred in sustaining the state's hearsay objection for the reason that his statements he was "high" or intoxicated were self serving. (citation omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Whitfield v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.