Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2018
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gibson v. United States · American States Insurance v. Piasecki · 319 So. 2d 22 - Bailey v. State · 596 So. 2d 442 - Doctor v. State · P.L.R. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by the officer that he had a feeling based on his experience. See id. (finding that the State provided the specific factual basis of the officer's experience to establish probable cause where the officer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[O]bservation of suspected contraband can suffice to provide an officer with probable cause if other circumstances exist to corroborate the officer's suspicion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Relevant to this inquiry is the officer's specific experience with respect to the particular narcotic in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.