Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 So. 2d 927 - Clark v. State

693 So. 2d 927 - Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State (2003), 737 So. 2d 322 - Puckett v. State (1999)

34 state decisions

180199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 616 So. 2d 298 - Noe v. State · 478 So. 2d 1017 - Harper v. State · Peterson v. State · 681 So. 2d 82 - Morgan v. State · 566 So. 2d 680 - Welch v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of the excitement caused by the event or condition.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Hearsay" is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “determination of spontaneity `is a question for the trial judge, whose action should not be overturned unless this Court would be justified in concluding that under all and any reasonable interpretation of the facts the exclamation could not have been spontaneous.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.