Warren v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Sharp v. State (1986), Tamez v. State (2000)
2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peltier v. State · 53 Tex. Crim. 596 - Essary v. State · Trammell v. State · Castillo v. State · Welch v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The indictment or information shall be read to the jury by the attorney prosecuting. When prior convictions are alleged for purposes of enhancement only and are not jurisdictional, that portion of the indictment or information reciting such convictions shall not be read until the hearing on punishment is held as provided in Article 37.07.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tamez v. State · Lara v. State““[t]o inform the accused of the charges against him and to inform the jury of the precise terms of the particular charge against the accused. (Citation Omitted) Without the reading of the indictment and the entering of a plea, no issue is joined upon which to try. (Citations Omitted).” Warren, 693 S.W.2d at 415 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. State“Your Honor, it’s come to my knowledge that the enhancement paragraphs were not read to the defendant prior to proceeding on the punishment phase. And for the record we would object to that and ask for a mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Salinas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.