Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 693 SW2D 434 - Bell v. State

Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
4
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

96 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Rousseau v. State (1993), Bignall v. State (1994)

96 state decisions

3101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royster v. State · American Plant Food Corporation v. State · Day v. State · Aguilar v. State · Lugo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Patently, threatening another with imminent bodily injury is engaging in conduct. When that threat is accomplished by the use of a deadly weapon, by definition the victim is “exposed” to the deadly character of the weapon and the inherent risk of serious bodily injury. The danger of serious bodily injury is necessarily established when a deadly weapon is used in the commission of an offense. It follows, therefore, that proof of threatening another with imminent bodily injury by the use of a deadly weapon constitutes proof of engaging in conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) A person commits an offense if he recklessly engages in conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) it is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (2) it differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk of injury to the same person, property, or public interest suffices to establish its commission; (3) it differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less culpable mental state suffices to establish its commission; or (4) it consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or an otherwise included offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.