Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 694 A2D 704 - Rocchio v. Moretti

Rocchio v. Moretti’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Benner v. J.H. Lynch & Sons, Inc. · Penn-Dutch Kitchens, Inc. v. Grady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]l-though the language of the rule itself speaks to law of a foreign country, the committee notes to that rule make it clear that the intention was to require notice in any case involving law of a foreign country or state * * Rocchio v. Moretti, 694 A.2d 704 , 706 n. 2 (R.I.1997) (emphasis added); see Committee Notes to Rule 44.1. . A frequently cited legal dictionary defines renvoi in pertinent part as follows:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.