Green v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.2d 108 · 1982
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · DePaepe v. Richardson · Ferguson v. Schweiker · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission · Laffoon v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that written medical reports by licensed physicians who have examined the claimant may constitute 'substantial evidence' in a Social Security case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bowman v. Heckler“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cook v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.