Isham v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.2d 1196 · 1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1701Q (Living Equitably: Grandparents Aiding Children and Youth Act of 2003) · 42 U.S.C. § 1437F · 42 U.S.C. § 281 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 42 U.S.C. § 291 · 42 U.S.C. § 4601 (Uniform Relocation Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 4621 · 42 U.S.C. § 4622 · 42 U.S.C. § 4625
Relies on Adams v. Texas · Addington v. Texas · Barrett v. United States · Parlane Sportswear Co. v. Weinberger · Moorer v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]learly, no section [of the URA] provides that benefits should be extended to a person such as the plaintiff who was displaced by the acquisition of real property by a private party who would receive federal assistance in the future.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gomez v. Chody
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.