Schulthess v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.2d 175 · 1982
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 5 U.S.C. § 5596 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 8331 (Capitol Police Retirement Act)
Relies on United States v. Sherwood · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · Liotta v. National Forge Co. · Butler v. United States · Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. Hozier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The United States Claims Court shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.