Barbian v. Panagis’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.2d 476 · 1982
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Reed Rbk v. Village of Shorewood (1983), Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman Estates (1988)
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Parratt v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[citations omitted] Thus, the [Supreme] Court held in Codd v. Velger that a grievant need not be provided any opportunity to present evidence to support his arguments, when the essential facts surrounding the dispute had been previously resolved. In Codd, the plaintiff, a policeman discharged from the New York City police force, did not dispute the facts underlying his termination. The plaintiff complained only that the city had provided him no formal hearing before deciding to discharge him. The Court ruled * * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Green v. Finley · Greene v. Finley“if the hearing mandated by the Due Process Clause is to serve any useful purpose, there must be some factual dispute between an employer and a discharged employee which has some significant bearing on the [issue to be resolved]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Green v. Finley · Greene v. Finley“facts underlying the Department's decision had been extensively litigated and conclusively resolved at trial in the plaintiff's state court challenge on the Common Council rezoning decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Green v. Finley · Greene v. Finley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.