Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 694 F.2d 939 - Todman v. Boschulte

Todman v. Boschulte’s Empirical Analysis

694 F.2d 939 · 1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2000

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

40198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1591

Relies on Euwema v. Todman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Governor of Guam, together with the Lieutenant Governor, shall be elected "; "[t]he Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be chosen jointly, by the casting by each voter of a single vote "; "a runoff election shall be held between the candidates for Governor and Lieutenant Governor "; "[t]he first election for Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be held "; "[t]he Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall be elected every four years "; "[t]he Governor and Lieutenant Governor shall hold office until their successors are elected .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In reaching this conclusion, we note that in Euwema v. Todman, [ 323 F.Supp. 167 (D.Vi.1971) ], Judge Almeric Christian stated that “the proper basis for computing a majority” was that “voters not attending the election or not voting on the matter submitted are presumed to assent to the expressed will of those attending and voting and are not to be taken into consideration in determining the result.” We agree with this statement of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.