Billiot v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.2d 98 · 1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Stone v. Powell · Bates v. State Bar · Delli Paoli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal courts possess no authority in habeas proceedings to scrutinize a state court's application of fourth amendment principles absent a showing that the petitioner was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate a claim arising out of a putatively illegal search or seizure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“opportunity to contest the introduction of incriminating evidence resulting from his arrest was not circumscribed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Penry v. Lynaugh“independent evaluation of the state court record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Penry v. Lynaugh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.