Eche v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.3d 1026 · 2012
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1806 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1421 (§ 310 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1427 (§ 316 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1447 (§ 336 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Downes v. Bidwell · Boumediene v. Bush · Boumediene v. Bush · Wabol v. Villacrusis · Northern Mariana Islands v. Atalig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“count toward the residence required for naturalization as a United States citizen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Torres v. Barr“residence in the CNMI before United States immigration law became effective”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Torres v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.