Simon v. Keyspan Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.3d 196 · 2012
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 12 (§ 1 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 16 U.S.C. § 796 (§ 3 of the Federal Power Act of 1920) · 16 U.S.C. § 824E (§ 206 of the Federal Power Act of 1920)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois · Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. · Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applied strictly to prevent a plaintiff from bringing a cause of action even in the face of apparent inequities whenever either the nondiscrimination strand or the nonjusticiability strand underlying the doctrine is implicated by the cause of action the plaintiff seeks to pursue.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is nearly impossible for a court to determine which portion of an overcharge is actually borne by the direct purchaser and which portion is borne by a subsequent indirect purchaser.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“extended across the spectrum of regulated utilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. De Mejias v. Malloy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.