Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 694 F.3d 463 - United States v. Navedo

United States v. Navedo’s Empirical Analysis

694 F.3d 463 · 2012

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Payton v. New York · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would only receive the information if that individual was involved in criminal activity, specifically related to narcotics. That’s what [his] assignment was that day to be out there for. That was what Officer Czapor’s assignment was. So he wouldn’t have given it to me if it wasn't related to narcotics.” App. 94 4 .The District Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the denial of a motion to suppress”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Fourth Amendment standing is one element of a Fourth Amendment claim, and does not implicate federal jurisdiction. Consequently, standing can be conceded by the government, and it is also subject to the ordinary rule that an argument not raised in the district court is waived on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “such flight [in a high crime area] and the setting in which it occurs, is merely one of many factors police may reasonably consider before making an investigative stop under Terry”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.