King v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.3d 650 · 2012
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Olano · Graham v. Connor · Kentucky v. Graham · Tennessee v. Garner · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“means by which a defendant receives notice of an action and is formally brought within a court's jurisdiction.” King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 659 (6th Cir.2012) (stating that, between the two defenses,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Boulger v. Woods · Boulger v. Woods“cause[s] the court to go to some effort that would be wasted if personal jurisdiction is later found lacking.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[A] motion to dismiss on the basis of improper service made during the period for service may properly be denied as premature.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boulger v. Woods · Boulger v. Woods
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.