Miller v. Colson’s Empirical Analysis
694 F.3d 691 · 2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Williams v. Taylor · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Sandstrom v. Montana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur own internal conflict about the scope of Ake evidences the reasonableness of the state court decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. McWilliams v. Dunn“contrary to, or involve[ ] an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ward v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.