Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Prann’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823 · 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Merchants National Bank of Mobile · 641 F. Supp. 740 - Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Nemecek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), under which Girod loaned Bracero $950,000 for the construction project. In exchange, Bracero executed and delivered to Girod a promissory note, payable to the bearer on demand, for the amount of the loan plus 15% yearly interest. The note was secured by a registered mortgage executed by Bracero on the housing project property. In March, 1983, Bracero increased the mortgage note to $2 million and executed and registered a deed to this effect. 3 On April 13, 1984, Bracero sold the housing project property to Development and Investment Corporation (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Notice of Development's payment of Bracero's bank balance and the bank's own documentation cancelling the same were in the hands of FDIC at all relevant times and, in fact, were produced by FDIC at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen the FDIC purchased the Bank's assets, it could not have purchased defendants' note, as it had been previously extinguished. Section 1823(e) applies only to assets which the FDIC has acquired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.