694 F. Supp. 259 - Hadix v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997 (Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Bounds v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, and to what extent, the defendants are constitutionally required to provide access to the courts for inmates in the Central Complex through the provision of additional attorneys, paralegals (civilian or inmate), and other means to assist inmates with civil actions (including habeas corpus proceedings) and related matters (i.e., grievances).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Knop v. Johnson“Jails and penitentiaries include among their inmates a high percentage of persons who are totally or functional illiterate, whose educational attainments are slight, and whose intelligence is limited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Glover v. Johnson“[o]ther civil claims involving matters such as domestic relations, personal injury, deportation, workers' compensation, social security, detainer, wills and estates, and taxation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Knop v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.