Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2017
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Davis v. State · Thomas v. State · Bellmore v. State · Lowery v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ilt is defendant's duty to present this Court with an adequate record on appeal and when defendant fails to do so, the issue is deemed waived. See Stallings v. State, 508 N.E.2d 550, 552 (Ind.1987); Jackson v. State, 496 N.E.2d 32, 33 (Ind.1986).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State · Lyles v. State“[W]e presume that counsel rendered adequate assistance and find nothing to rebut the application of that presumption here.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. D.D.K. v. State · DDK v. State“may have been appropriate under circumstances like this case where the claim asserted arguably requires a certain level of fact finding[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DDK v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.