Gillmor v. Gillmor’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2017
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schilbach v. Schilbach · 28 Ill. App. 3d 36 - Gilmore v. Gilmore · Thompson v. Jones · 29 Colo. App. 205 - McNichols v. CONEJOS-K CORPORATION · Fassitt v. Seip
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a cotenant out of possession makes a clear, unequivocal demand to use land that is in the exelusive possession of another cotenant, and that cotenant refuses to accommodate the other tenant's right to use the land.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“requires either an act of exelusion or use of such a nature that it necessarily prevents another cotenant from exercising his rights in the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] cotenant who ousts another cotenant or acts in such a fashion as to necessarily exclude a fellow cotenant, violates the rights of that cotenant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.