Kelly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2011
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mattox v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Hutton v. United States · State v. Jeffers · Martinez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exception is. founded upon the proposition that a statement made during the stress of excitement resulting from a startling event is probably trustworthy, since there is not leisure to reflect, contrive or fabricate. Lancaster v. People, 200 Colo. 448 , 615 P.2d 720 (1980); Bankers Life Co. v. Nelson, 56 Wyo. 243 , 108 P.2d 584 (1940), rehearing denied, 56 Wyo. 513 , 111 P.2d 136 (1941).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oldman v. State““Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed * * * by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stinehart v. State“ran screaming across the street 'bursting' into her neighbor's residence....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marquess v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.