State v. Nash’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · 573 So. 2d 528 - State v. Benjamin · United Biscuit Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission · New York Central R. Co. v. United States · 683 So. 2d 769 - State v. Jiron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The duty of the appellate court in reviewing an Anders appeal is to determine whether there are any nonfrivolous issues which arguably support the appeal. State v. Benjamin [ 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990)] at 531.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fazande
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.