Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · King v. Lynaugh · 511 So. 2d 295 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · Richardson v. Illinois · 533 So. 2d 270 - Swafford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. Citing to Swafford , we held that the exclusion from hearsay found in section 90.801(2)(c) did not apply because the officer testified to the victim's description of the intruder. See id. Without so stating, we adopted Swafford `s conclusion that a declarant's description of a person is not a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“because of the admission of hearsay testimony of a police officer as to the description of a suspect given to him by the victim of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“officer was permitted to testify as to [the] victim's description of the intruder on the date of the incident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.