694 So. 2d 1168 - Maze v. Grogan’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 292 So. 2d 216 - LeBrane v. Lewis · 639 So. 2d 224 - Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald · 559 So. 2d 467 - Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. · 433 So. 2d 1109 - Johnson v. Dufrene
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Whether the tortious act was primarily employment rooted; 2) Whether the violence was reasonably incidental to the performance of the employee's duties; 3) Whether the act occurred on the employer's premises; and 4) Whether it occurred during the hours of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.