694 So. 2d 1342 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 648 So. 2d 553 - Bloodsaw v. United Insurance Co. of America · 541 So. 2d 1057 - Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co. v. Hardy · Ex Parte Neely
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The writ of mandamus is an extraordinary writ that applies 'where a party seeks emergency and immediate appellate review of an order that is otherwise interlocutory and not appealable.' Rule 21(e)(4), Ala. R.App. P. In order for this Court to issue a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that there is: '(1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) properly invoked jurisdiction of the court.' Ex parte Bloodsaw , 648 So.2d 553 (Ala. 1994)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.