Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

694 So. 2d 888

M.J. v. A.B.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-06-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2007

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s judgment establishing paternity in this action, which also awarded shared parental responsibility and provided visitation rights for the father’s parents. The trial court determined that it was in the best interest of the parties’ seven-year-old daughter to have grandparental visitation with the father’s parents so that the child could visit her father at a Florida prison. See § 61.13(2)(b)2.c., Fla. Stat. (1995). Our record lacks a transcript of the hearing and does not provide a basis to reverse the trial court’s decision. Our affirmance does not preclude the mother from seeking a modification of the visitation schedule should the visits prove traumatic to the child.

¶2Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.
/694/so2d/888 · .json · Public domain