Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 F.2d 104 - Adams v. McDougal

Adams v. McDougal’s Empirical Analysis

695 F.2d 104 · 1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Oden v. Oktibbeha County (2001), Smith v. Monsanto Chemical Co. (1985)

11 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Elrod v. Burns · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To the extent that the Kyles court felt constrained by a strict reading of Louisiana law regarding the status of deputy sheriffs, that decision is incorrect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “despite the indefinite tenure of the job of deputy sheriff, the sheriff and his deputies had expectations arising from the deputy's employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “definite and firm impression that a mistake has been made,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.