Williams v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
695 F.2d 119 · 1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Washington v. Watkins · 322 So. 2d 189 - State v. Butler · State v. Holmes · Beavers v. Balkcom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such intent might reasonably be implied from the intentional use of a deadly weapon to provide injuries involving serious risks to death.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no rational trier of fact could have found proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.