Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 F.2d 799 - Moore v. Bonner

Moore v. Bonner’s Empirical Analysis

695 F.2d 799 · 1982

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Charchenko v. City of Stillwater (1995), Plaine v. McCabe (1986)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

2201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Patsy v. Florida International University · Mitchell v. National Broadcasting Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he choice of whether to proceed in a state or federal forum [ ] necessarily belongs to the plaintiffs and they cannot be deprived of it by a state rule which gives preclusive effect to unappealed state administrative decisions. A contrary rule would frequently force plaintiffs to choose between foregoing the opportunity to resolve their problems before state administrative bodies and relinquishing their congressionally mandated access to federal courts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “full-faith-and-credit dignity accorded state court decisions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.