Herbert v. Dickhaut’s Empirical Analysis
695 F.3d 105 · 2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Carey Warden v. Saffold · Neverson v. Farquharson · Pedraza v. Shell Oil Co. · Gaskins v. Duval · Mains v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Massachusetts, a "gatekeeper" justice's decision pursuant to section 33E, "whether it is to permit or prohibit an appeal, is final and unreviewable." Commonwealth v. Smith , 460 Mass. 318 , 322, 951 N.E.2d 322 (2011). Thus, in Massachusetts, the denial of a section 33E motion marks the end of the pendency of an application for post-conviction relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“There can be no waiver where a party lacked an - 16 - Bankr. D.P.R. R. 1001-1(b) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.