Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 F.3d 1060 - Davis v. Workman

Davis v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis

695 F.3d 1060 · 2012

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the relinquishment of the right must have been voluntary in the sense that it was the product of a free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception. Second, the waiver must have been made with a frill awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it. Only if the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation reveal both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension may a court properly conclude that the Miranda rights have been waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is no recognized constitutional right for criminal defendants to present evidence that is not SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 20 (0) 1417A 400 relevant and not material to his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “review under § 2254(d)(1) is limited to the record that was before the state court that adjudicated the claim on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.