Shrable v. Eaton Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
695 F.3d 768 · 2012
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 29 U.S.C. § 1140 (§ 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 215
Relies on El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Neztsosie · Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. · Rita Saenz Director California Department of Social Servicess v. Brenda Roe Anna Doe · United States v. Escalante-Reyes · Kipp v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If there is 'no dispute of material fact and reasonable fact finders could not find in favor of the nonmoving party, summary judgment is appropriate.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.