Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 FSUPP2D 109 - In Re iac/interactivecorp Securities Litigation

In Re iac/interactivecorp Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 2014
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77O (§ 15 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. · Shields v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc. · Carol Novak v. Sally Frame

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendants' actual knowledge of the trend is an essential allegation for purposes of a claim based on Item 303.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). . With respect to the September 26, 2012 conference call, Plaintiffs do not argue that the statements made by Goergen and Bar-ghaus were”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.