695 F. Supp. 2d 843 - Holmes v. BACK DOCTORS, LTD.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 47 U.S.C. § 227
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Cort v. Ash · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a margin at the top or bottom of each transmitted page of the message or on the first page ... the date and time it is sent and an identification of the business ... sending the message and the telephone number of the sending machine”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.