Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 695 P2D 640 - Broom v. State

Broom v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Scadden v. State (1987), Bouwkamp v. State (1992)

50 state decisions

2401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Johnson v. Louisiana · Curley v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not whether the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for us, but rather whether it is sufficient to form the basis for a reasonable inference of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to be drawn by the jury when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the State. * * * * * *”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Once a defendant has been found guilty of the crime charged, the factfinder's role as weigher of the evidence is preserved through a legal conclusion that upon judicial review all of the evidence is to be considered in the light most favorable to the prosecution”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether or not the evidence was sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but [instead] whether or not the evidence could reasonably support such a finding by the factfinder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.